Key Points in This Guide
- 1Full state-by-state enforcement table: banned, limited, reasonableness, and employer-friendly states
- 2Salary thresholds for Colorado, Illinois, Massachusetts, Washington, Oregon, and more
- 33 word-for-word negotiation scripts for the most common situations
- 4"Blue pencil" vs "red pencil" states: what courts do when clauses are too broad
- 5International table: Germany, France, UK, Australia, China, Singapore, and more
- 65-step checklist to complete before signing any non-compete
- 77 complete FAQs covering jurisdiction conflicts, EU compensation, and enforcement risk
Whether a non-compete will actually be enforced against you depends almost entirely on which state — or country — you work in. Four US states ban them outright. Eight states make them unenforceable below a salary threshold. Germany requires employers to pay you during the restricted period. This guide gives you the complete state-by-state enforcement table, the exact salary thresholds, word-for-word negotiation scripts, and a global country reference — everything you need before you sign.
US State-by-State Non-Compete Enforcement Table
Whether a non-compete will actually be enforced against you depends more on which state you work in than on anything the contract says. The table below covers the 50 most important jurisdictions — from outright bans to highly employer-friendly states.
| State | Enforceability | Max Duration | Salary Threshold | Key Rule |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| California | BANNED | — | — | Bus. & Prof. Code §16600; courts ignore choice-of-law clauses |
| North Dakota | BANNED | — | — | Century Code §9-08-06; one of the oldest bans in the US |
| Minnesota | BANNED (2023) | — | — | Minn. Stat. §181.988; applies to agreements signed after Jan 1 2023 |
| Oklahoma | BANNED | — | — | 15 O.S. §219A; statutory ban with narrow trade-secret exception |
| Colorado | Limited | 12 months | $123,750/yr | C.R.S. §8-2-113; must serve legitimate business interest |
| Illinois | Limited | 12 months | $75,000/yr | 820 ILCS 90; 14-day advance notice required before signing |
| Massachusetts | Limited | 12 months | Variable | M.G.L. c.149 §24L; employer must offer garden leave pay or other consideration |
| Oregon | Limited | 12 months | $113,709/yr | ORS §653.295; 2-week advance written notice required |
| Washington | Limited | 18 months | $116,593/yr | RCW §49.62; compensation required if >18 months |
| Rhode Island | Limited | Variable | $28.16/hr | RIGL §28-59; low-wage worker ban (2023 update) |
| Virginia | Limited | Variable | $73,320/yr | Va. Code §40.1-28.7:8; low-wage worker ban |
| Maine | Limited | Variable | $7.50/hr | MRSA §599-A; advance notice required |
| New Hampshire | Limited | Variable | Variable | RSA §275:70; recent reform; advance notice required |
| New York | Reasonableness | Variable | None | Common law test; reform legislation pending as of 2025 |
| Texas | Reasonableness | Usually ≤2yr | None | Bus. & Com. Code §15.51; blue-pencil state; must tie to consideration |
| Florida | Employer-Friendly | Variable | None | F.S. §542.335; rebuttable presumption enforced; courts cannot refuse injunctions |
| Georgia | Employer-Friendly | Variable | None | O.C.G.A. §13-8-53; 2010 statutory reform strengthened enforcement |
| Nevada | Reasonableness | Variable | None | NRS §613.200; 2017 reform added salary-based carve-outs |
| Delaware | Reasonableness | Variable | None | Common law; courts often blue-pencil overly broad clauses |
| Pennsylvania | Reasonableness | Variable | None | Common law; courts strict on geographic/temporal scope |
The Four States Where Non-Competes Are Completely Banned
California is the most important jurisdiction to understand. Under Business & Professions Code §16600, any contract that restrains a person from engaging in a lawful profession, trade, or business of any kind is void. California courts have repeatedly held that this ban applies even when an out-of-state employer includes a non-California governing law clause — if you work in California, California law protects you.
North Dakota has banned non-competes since 1890 under Century Code §9-08-06. Minnesota joined in January 2023, making agreements signed on or after January 1, 2023 void under Minn. Stat. §181.988. Oklahoma bans them under 15 O.S. §219A, with a narrow exception for someone who sells the goodwill of a business.
If your contract has a non-compete and you work in any of these four states, the clause is unenforceable regardless of what the contract says — and you can say so directly when asked to sign.
💬 Script: You work in California / North Dakota / Minnesota / Oklahoma
Say this to HR or the hiring manager: "I perform all of my work in [State]. Under [State] law — specifically [Bus. & Prof. Code §16600 / N.D. Cent. Code §9-08-06 / Minn. Stat. §181.988 / 15 O.S. §219A] — this non-compete is void regardless of the governing law clause in the contract. I'm happy to sign the agreement, but I'd like to either (a) remove this clause entirely, or (b) add a written acknowledgment that it will not be enforced against work I perform in [State]. Which do you prefer?"
States with Salary Thresholds: Are You Below the Limit?
Eight states have passed laws that make non-competes unenforceable for workers below a specific salary threshold. These thresholds are typically adjusted annually for inflation. If your total compensation — base salary plus bonuses, but usually excluding equity — falls below the applicable threshold, the non-compete is void by statute regardless of what the contract says.
Colorado's threshold ($123,750 as of 2025) is the highest in the country, which means a large share of Colorado workers are simply exempt. Illinois ($75,000) also covers a significant portion of mid-level professionals. Massachusetts requires not just a minimum salary but also that the employer pay the employee during the restricted period — either at least 50% of their base salary ("garden leave") or mutually agreed alternative compensation.
💬 Script: Your salary is below the Colorado / Illinois / Massachusetts threshold
Say this in writing (email is better than verbal): "My total annual compensation is [$ amount], which is below the statutory threshold for non-compete agreements in [State] under [C.R.S. §8-2-113 / 820 ILCS 90 / M.G.L. c.149 §24L]. Under [State] law, this clause is unenforceable as applied to me. I'm asking that the agreement either (a) remove the non-compete clause, or (b) include a written carve-out confirming it does not apply to employees below the statutory salary threshold. I want to move forward with this role — I just need the contract to reflect what the law already requires."
"Blue Pencil" vs "Red Pencil" States: What Courts Do When Clauses Are Too Broad
When a non-compete is overbroad — covering too large a geography, too long a duration, or too broad a scope of activity — courts in different states take dramatically different approaches.
In "blue pencil" states (Texas, Florida, Georgia, Delaware, and others), courts will rewrite the clause to the narrowest enforceable version. A nationwide 5-year ban becomes a 50-mile, 1-year ban. This is actually worse for employees: it means you cannot escape a bad non-compete on the grounds of overbreadth, because the court will fix it for the employer.
In "red pencil" or "all-or-nothing" states (California — obviously — plus some interpretations in Pennsylvania, New York, and others), an overbroad clause is void entirely. Courts will not rewrite it. This gives you more leverage: if the employer drafts an obviously overbroad clause, it may be entirely unenforceable.
💡 Tip: Use overbreadth as leverage in red-pencil states
If your contract is governed by a red-pencil state's law and the non-compete covers nationwide geography or spans 3+ years, point this out before signing: "Courts in [State] won't modify an overbroad non-compete — they'll void it entirely. Rather than risk having the whole clause thrown out, would you narrow it to [12 months / your metro area / direct competitors] so it's actually defensible?" This reframe helps the employer see that narrowing is in their interest, not just yours.
Concrete Situations: Exact Scripts for the 3 Most Common Negotiations
Most people never try to negotiate a non-compete because they don't know what to say. These three scripts cover the situations that come up most frequently.
💬 Script 1 — Duration is too long (anything over 12 months)
"The non-compete as written covers [18/24] months. Courts in [your state] typically uphold restrictions of 12 months or less for roles like mine — beyond that, they tend to narrow or void the clause. I'd like to propose 12 months from my last day. That's the industry standard for [your role/sector], it's clearly defensible, and it gives you the protection you need. Can we make that change?"
💬 Script 2 — Geography is too broad (nationwide or global)
"The non-compete restricts me from working with competitors anywhere in the United States [/ globally]. My actual role involves [clients / territory / product lines] in [region/market]. A restriction limited to [your metro area / the states where you have client relationships / your specific product line] would protect your real business interest without limiting my ability to find work in areas that have no impact on your business. I'd like to narrow the geographic scope to [specific area]. Does that work for your team?"
💬 Script 3 — The clause covers the entire industry, not just direct competitors
"The non-compete prohibits me from working for any company that 'competes in the [industry] space,' which would cover thousands of employers — including companies that have no overlap with your actual business. I'd like to narrow this to [list 3–5 named direct competitors] or to companies working specifically on [the product/service that actually competes with yours]. A narrower definition is more defensible in court and doesn't impair your legitimate business interest. Can we revise the definition of 'Competitor'?"
International Quick Reference: Non-Compete Rules by Country
For workers outside the US — or US workers signing contracts with international governing law clauses — the following table summarizes the key rules in major economies.
| Country | Enforceability | Compensation Required? | Typical Max Duration | Key Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Germany | Enforceable | Yes — min 50% salary | 2 years | Karenzentschädigung; employer must pay or clause is void |
| France | Enforceable | Yes — 30–60% salary | 2 years | Indemnité de non-concurrence; must be in writing |
| United Kingdom | Reasonableness | No (proposed reform) | 6–12 months | Common law test; reform to cap at 3 months proposed |
| Australia | Reasonableness | No | Variable | NSW Restraints of Trade Act; courts may blue-pencil |
| Canada | Reasonableness | No | Variable | Province-by-province; Ontario restricts for employees (2021) |
| Japan | Limited | Required in practice | 1–2 years | Courts require demonstrated trade secret interest |
| Singapore | Employer-Friendly | No | 1–2 years | English common law; routinely enforced for senior staff |
| China | Enforceable | Yes — min 30% avg salary | 2 years | Labor Contract Law Art. 23–24; compensation mandatory |
| Netherlands | Enforceable | For fixed-term contracts | 1 year typical | Written justification required for fixed-term employment |
| Sweden | Limited | Yes — 60% salary | 9–18 months | Swedish Employers' Confederation agreement; compensation required |
Before You Sign: Your 5-Step Non-Compete Checklist
Use this checklist before signing any employment contract that contains a non-compete clause.
💡 5-Step Checklist Before Signing
1. IDENTIFY YOUR STATE'S LAW — Where will you actually perform the work? Check the table above for your state's rules. The governing law clause in the contract does not always control. 2. CHECK THE SALARY THRESHOLD — Is your total compensation above or below your state's statutory threshold (Colorado $123,750 / Illinois $75,000 / Oregon $113,709 / Washington $116,593)? 3. MEASURE THE SCOPE — Duration over 12 months, geography beyond your actual market, and scope covering all competitors (not just direct ones) are all negotiable red flags. 4. DEMAND CONSIDERATION — In most states, a non-compete added after you've already started working requires additional consideration (a raise, bonus, or other benefit) to be enforceable. A clause dropped into an existing offer letter with nothing new is often void. 5. UPLOAD THE CONTRACT — Run the full clause-by-clause AI analysis below. You'll get the specific risk level, flagged language, and negotiation tips for your exact contract within 90 seconds.
Have a contract to review?
Upload your contract now and get an AI risk analysis in under 90 seconds.